Comparison
Adamiro vs. Peec AI.
Peec is a good analytics product for a marketing team. Adamiro is a working tool for one person who has no marketing team. That single difference explains almost everything else.
Read their pricing page carefully.
Starter is 70 euros a month for 50 prompts and three models. Pro is 180 euros for 150 prompts. Advanced is 360 euros for 350 prompts, multi-country tracking and a Looker Studio integration. Every tier includes unlimited users, and there is separate agency pricing (peec.ai, August 2026).
Unlimited users on every plan is the tell. This is priced for a team, and the tiers scale by how many prompts and projects that team is tracking. Their own copy says it: for SEO and content managers, for SEO teams, for marketing teams managing multiple projects.
Adamiro is priced per operator, because it assumes there is one.
A dashboard assumes someone downstream.
Peec measures visibility, position and sentiment across AI platforms, benchmarks you against named competitors, and exports into reporting tools. On analytics it is better than Adamiro’s module: we do not do share of voice against a rival list, per-country tracking or sentiment scoring.
But an analytics product is built on an assumption, and it is a reasonable one for their buyer: that a person exists whose job starts where the dashboard ends. Someone reads the report, decides what to publish, writes it, and ships it.
For a founder that person does not exist. A better dashboard does not help; it adds another thing to look at on a Tuesday evening and feel bad about.
What Adamiro does with the same finding.
Our AI Visibility module is deliberately thinner: a score, a trend per engine, a breakdown by buying stage, and the sentences models actually produce about you.
What it has instead of depth is a next step. The gap becomes a Voice draft in your voice and then a scheduled post through Reach, informed by a briefing that already knows your market. Nothing gets re-explained to a second product.
Fewer numbers, shorter distance to something published. For an operator that trade is worth making. For an SEO team it probably is not.
Who should buy which.
Buy Peec if you have someone whose job includes search, you want named-competitor benchmarking and per-country data, and you need it in a report other people read. Their agency pricing exists because agencies are a natural fit.
Buy Adamiro if you are the person who would have to act on the report, and what you actually need is fewer inputs and a shorter path from finding to published.
If you are an agency tracking AI visibility across a client roster, this is not a close call and Peec is built for you.
Adamiro vs. Peec AI: Side by side
| Peec AI | Adamiro | |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | Yes. 70 / 180 / 360 euros a month, Enterprise custom (August 2026) | Yes. $49 to $499/mo, 14-day trial |
| Priced by | Prompts tracked and projects, unlimited users | The operator, with seats added on Business and Team |
| Stated buyer | SEO and content managers, SEO teams, marketing teams, agencies | A founder or CEO who is also the marketing department |
| Metrics | Visibility, position, sentiment, competitor benchmarking, per-country on Advanced | Score, per-engine trend, buying-stage breakdown, and how models describe you |
| Models | Choose 3 of 6 on most tiers, up to 11 on Enterprise | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode |
| Reporting | Looker Studio integration, API on Enterprise | In-product. No BI integration |
| What happens after the finding | You take it to whoever writes | It becomes a draft and a scheduled post in the same subscription |
| Market intelligence | Not the product’s scope | Signals briefings and Radar competitor monitoring |
| Advisory | Not the product’s scope | Mentor, and The Tank’s five advisors |
Questions worth asking
Is Peec’s AI search analytics better than Adamiro’s?
For analytics, yes. Sentiment scoring, competitor benchmarking and per-country tracking are all things we do not do. Ours is built to trigger an action, not to populate a report.
Could I use Peec and Adamiro together?
If AI search is a real channel for you and someone owns it, that works: their measurement, our drafting and publishing. For one person covering everything, two subscriptions aimed at one question is usually the wrong call.
Why is Adamiro’s module deliberately thinner?
Because every extra dimension is another judgement an operator has to make. We would rather show three things that change what you do this week than fifteen that need interpreting.
Do you benchmark against named competitors?
Not in AI Visibility. Radar tracks named competitors for market moves, which is a different question from share of voice inside an AI answer.
Last reviewed: August 2026